cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin-developers/2003/02/28/12:00:57

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:00:58 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Releasing new sh-utils now with access() change?
Message-ID: <20030228170058.GA9681@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

Pierre,
There is no reason for me to hold off on releasing a new sh-utils, with
the eaccess -> access change now, right?  /bin/test won't work any worse
than it does already with this change, right?

cgf

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019