cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <3E5F9E9C.6A00AA6E@ieee.org> |
Date: | Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:38:36 -0500 |
From: | "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org> |
X-Accept-Language: | en,pdf |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Releasing new sh-utils now with access() change? |
References: | <20030228170058 DOT GA9681 AT redhat DOT com> |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Pierre, > There is no reason for me to hold off on releasing a new sh-utils, with > the eaccess -> access change now, right? /bin/test won't work any worse > than it does already with this change, right? > > cgf Chris, I would not release a new /bin/test until 1.3.21 is out. With 1.3.20 the behavior will be different, sometimes better, sometimes worse. In particular the current /bin/test always produces correct results on files created by Cygwin, while sh (and the new /bin/test ) currently don't. /> ls -l test3 ---x-wxrwx 1 PHumblet Users 0 Feb 18 16:20 test3* /> if /bin/test -r test3 ; then echo yes; else echo no; fi no /> sh -c 'if [ -r test3 ] ; then echo yes; else echo no; fi' yes <== WRONG /> bash -c 'if [ -r test3 ] ; then echo yes; else echo no; fi' no Pierre
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |