cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | nxk3 AT dante DOT student DOT cwru DOT edu (Natarajan Krishnaswami) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: DJGPP is not strict enough ??? |
Date: | 8 Feb 1997 18:52:47 GMT |
Organization: | Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH (USA) |
Lines: | 19 |
Message-ID: | <slrn5fpirm.1kd.nxk3@dante.student.cwru.edu> |
References: | <1997Feb5 DOT 173245 DOT 93344 AT cc DOT usu DOT edu> <32F96574 DOT 2C36 AT cs DOT com> |
Reply-To: | nxk3 AT dante DOT cwru DOT edu |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | dante.student.cwru.edu |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
On Wed, 05 Feb 1997 21:00:36 -0800, John M. Aldrich <fighteer AT cs DOT com> wrote: > CHRISTINA wrote: > > > > Is there anyway I can force djgpp > > to check if I've included the necessary > > libraries? > > Use the '-Wall' switch when you compile, and gcc will give you warnings > about implicit function declarations. Then, just look up the indicated > function in the libc docs to see what header file it belongs to. Just a quick comment: Christina mentioned that she was writing C++ code, but doesn't gcc typically automatically warns about implicit declarations when compiling C++? TTYL, N.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |