cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | frenchc AT cadvision DOT com (Calvin French) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Allegro Translucency/Lighting tables -- Should be made separate? |
Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 1997 12:20:10 GMT |
Organization: | CADVision Development Corp. |
Lines: | 12 |
Message-ID: | <5eqklv$15gq@elmo.cadvision.com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ts29ip55.cadvision.com |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
I'm probably missing something, but why do the translucency and lighting draw functions use the same global table? Why not either: a) make 2 different global tables. or better yet, b) pass a pointer to the table you want to use as an arguement (maybe make a c++ default value set to one of the 2 different global tables. - Calvin -
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |