From:	Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: R-M
Date:	Sat, 08 Mar 1997 22:09:15 -0800
Organization:	Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<3322540B.64DE@cam.org>
References:	<19970306 DOT 175707 DOT 9655 DOT 2 DOT chambersb AT juno DOT com>
Reply-To:	tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dynppp-208.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Benjamin D Chambers wrote:
> 
> I've thought about it for a few days, and I'll have to cast my vote this
> way:
> Split the group/mailing list.
> 
> As in, we'd have djgpp-questions (or something), and djgpp-ramblings (I
> don't like the -wizards idea, cause I know I'd subscribe and I know I'm
> not a wizard :).
> The questions one would be for anyone who needs help, and the ramblings
> one would just be ramblings about anything people post (similar to the
> way they do now, just now they'd have their own list and wouldn't bother
> people who aren't interested in such threads).
> 
> As usual, any questions/comments/flames appreciated.
I didn't follow the thread, but I have to ask a question: WHY?
Why do you want to split or moderate c.o.m.d ?I mean,yes, there are some
kinda-off-topic threads, but c.o.m.d is still quite quiet.It's not like
comp.lang.asm.x86 or anything... Now if that Scott Nudds would come to
this newsgroup YES I think c.o.m.d should be moderated so it is not
transformed into something like comp.lang.c. But untill then...
(I actually hope that will never happen)
> ..Chambers

-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
http://www.cam.org/~tudor
'This is Scott Nudds of the Borg. C is irrelevant.'

- Raw text -