cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Paul Shirley <Paul AT no DOT spam DOT please> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: template classes with DJGPP |
Date: | Sat, 16 Aug 1997 13:20:09 +0100 |
Organization: | wot? me? |
Lines: | 18 |
Distribution: | world |
Message-ID: | <sIItVBA5rZ9zEwpS@foobar.co.uk> |
References: | <01bca10d$bb446600$0100a8c0 AT stefan DOT schimanski> |
<5s768v$n84$1 AT horus DOT mch DOT sni DOT de> <5sbrs1$k88 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> | |
<33E9ACFD DOT 54D2A38E AT Mathematik DOT TU-Chemnitz DOT DE> | |
<5sejhe$k6a AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> | |
Reply-To: | Paul Shirley <Paul AT chocolat DOT obvious DOT fake DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | chocolat.foobar.co.uk |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
In article <5sejhe$k6a AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>, Paul Derbyshire <ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA> writes >And as I recall, the C++ standard library *is* under the LGPL *except* for >iostream. First define 'C++ standard library' I see libg++, the proprietary GNU C++ library (LGPL,definitely not standard) I see libiostream, LGPL special exemption (ie NOT LGPL in normal use *because* its a de-facto standard) I see the STL, copyright HP (so how could FSF restrict it?) Is there another 'standard' lib I've missed? --- Visit www.dukepsx.com: see what I do all day. Paul Shirley: my email address is 'obvious'ly anti-spammed
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |