cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Paul Shirley <Paul AT no DOT spam DOT please> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Near, far, and error messages |
Date: | Wed, 3 Sep 1997 14:20:05 +0100 |
Organization: | wot? me? |
Lines: | 13 |
Distribution: | world |
Message-ID: | <eAZtBFAFQWD0EwTn@foobar.co.uk> |
References: | <5uir5n$rk2 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> |
Reply-To: | Paul Shirley <Paul AT chocolat DOT obvious DOT fake DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | chocolat.foobar.co.uk |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
In article <5uir5n$rk2 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>, Paul Derbyshire <ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA> writes >As a compromise to changing the FAQ about near and far (and huge? never >seen that), perhaps instead DJGPP can be twiddled slightly to display a >more explicit error message about near and far, or else to silently ignore >them. Since near,far and huge are *not* C reserved words this would be a compiler error if added to gcc. Get a clue. --- Visit www.dukepsx.com: see what I do all day. Paul Shirley: my email address is 'obvious'ly anti-spammed
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |