Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/22/14:42:06
Ben N Shadwick wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 1997 23:54:00 -0700 Mitchell Spector
> <spector AT EnchantedLearning DOT com> writes:
> >Interesting... I haven't seen this on my machine, at least not
> >flipping between a full-screen DOS box and the Win95 screen. What
> >video mode do you find exhibits this problem? After reading your
>
> Well, I use 640x480x256 in Win95 because that's the fastest mode I can
> get (I have an ancient TVGA8900 ISA video card - I really want a good 2mb
> VLB one). If I run a 640x480x256 DOS program and then, say, hit the Win95
> key, Win95 will overwrite the video memory with the desktop, so that when
> I try to return to the program, it kills it (because it can't restore the
> screen because it has already destroyed what was in the video memory). At
> least that's my theory... I suppose it might be able to save a copy of
> video memory IN video memory IF you have enough, but I doubt that Win95
> is that smart... The important thing is to make sure that Win95 and the
> DOS program are both using the EXACT same SVGA mode (though I haven't
> tried it otherwise I guess)
I set up a DOS program using exactly the same SVGA mode as my
Win95 screen, used Alt-Tab to switch back and forth between the
Win95 desktop and the full-screen DOS program, and it worked
correctly on my system (except for not restoring the border colors).
Maybe Win95 tries to save the video memory of the swapped-out process
if it can find enough RAM (or virtual memory) to do it?
> >message, I tried a variety of 256-color SVGA resolutions, but couldn't
> >get Win95 to flake out in that way. One thing it never does correctly
> >is to restore the border color in the DOS screen if you've changed
>
> Yes I've noticed that with some 320x200 progs I have - it makes palette
> color 0 be weird colors sometimes when I flip back. It can be very
> annoying.
>
> >it; there may well be other things that don't get saved and restored
> >either. And I do find that flipping between two DOS boxes can cause
> >the problem you mentioned.
>
> I guess the bottom line is just that Win95 isn't... as reliable as it
> could be, or as reliable as some people have been led to belive at least
> (not me =)
Well, I wasn't claiming any sort of robustness here :-). But,
actually, I haven't found Win95 to be as unstable as a lot of
people say (although it's not nearly as stable as Unix, of course).
> =====
> Ben Shadwick, Sysop, Mars Base BBS, (360)882-0773, Vancouver, WA, USA
Mitchell
--
Mitchell Spector, Enchanted Learning Software
E-mail: spector AT EnchantedLearning DOT com
Visit Enchanted Learning's award-winning children's web site!
-- http://www.EnchantedLearning.com --
- Raw text -