Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/09/29/13:59:06
Hi,
>ends up inside an exception handler set up by the extender. When this
>happens, the extender can do whatever it pleases; in particular, it
>could change the address and move the data on behalf of the
Thanx a lot. Protected mode appears _very_ flexible. I guess there would be
too much overhead with this exception handling (mayeb more than __dpmi_int).
Maybe Watcom does t that way. We'll leave it at this.
And a suggestion, how about writing "the _dos_ds() function" (note the
function call brackets) instead of "_dos_ds () remeber its a function". The
() at the end of the name somehow registers a _lot_ better than the mention
that its actually a function. Just a suggestion.
Bye,
Chirayu Krishnappa:
------------------
e-mail: chirayu AT radiolink DOT net or ruby AT radiolink DOT net
Phone: 91 080 3332616.
- Raw text -