cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/10/03/07:31:22

From: mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Ruiter de M)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: uname and processor type?
Date: 3 Oct 1997 10:19:08 GMT
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <612gqs$ar4$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
References: <6100u0$i0t$1 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sloep14.cs.vu.nl
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

I (mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl) wrote:
: Would it be possible to let uname detect the processor type in a next
: release?

: I personally don't know how, but it shouldn't be too difficult for
: *real* programmers.

: Right now, the only thing it reports is 'pc' which is of little use.

OK, let me explain why I ask this. It's not that *I* want to know what
processor I have (I already know that :), but people or programs
(config.guess) do. If they use 'uname' they don't want to know it's a
PC (MS-DOS for OS says enough about that), but also what processor
is used.

So maybe the maintainer/DJGPP-porter of uname (shellutils? => Eli? I
can't remember right now) can integrate some extra ID-procedures in
uname, to make it more useful.
-- 
Groeten, Michel.        http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mdruiter
 \----/==\----/
  \  /    \  /          "You know, Beavis, you need things that suck,
   \/      \/           to have things that are cool", Butt-Head.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019