Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/10/03/07:31:22
From: | mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl (Ruiter de M)
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: uname and processor type?
|
Date: | 3 Oct 1997 10:19:08 GMT
|
Organization: | Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
|
Lines: | 23
|
Message-ID: | <612gqs$ar4$1@star.cs.vu.nl>
|
References: | <6100u0$i0t$1 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | sloep14.cs.vu.nl
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
I (mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl) wrote:
: Would it be possible to let uname detect the processor type in a next
: release?
: I personally don't know how, but it shouldn't be too difficult for
: *real* programmers.
: Right now, the only thing it reports is 'pc' which is of little use.
OK, let me explain why I ask this. It's not that *I* want to know what
processor I have (I already know that :), but people or programs
(config.guess) do. If they use 'uname' they don't want to know it's a
PC (MS-DOS for OS says enough about that), but also what processor
is used.
So maybe the maintainer/DJGPP-porter of uname (shellutils? => Eli? I
can't remember right now) can integrate some extra ID-procedures in
uname, to make it more useful.
--
Groeten, Michel. http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mdruiter
\----/==\----/
\ / \ / "You know, Beavis, you need things that suck,
\/ \/ to have things that are cool", Butt-Head.
- Raw text -