cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C |
Date: | Sat, 04 Oct 1997 09:08:56 -0400 |
Organization: | Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada |
Lines: | 13 |
Message-ID: | <34363FE8.5AD@cam.org> |
References: | <34361EA4 DOT BFFADE9E AT worldonline DOT nl> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | dynamicppp-181.hip.cam.org |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reinier Heeres wrote: > > Hi! > > I would like to know if there are any other guys who'd like to see > NORMAL 80x86 assembly inline in their programs? Why isn't it build in? > Only because of the portability??? What do you mean by NORMAL assembly? Intel syntax? I don't consider that *normal*, both syntaxes are normal. Then, what else? -- --> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <-- Go ahead and build another Messiah We dig another grave...
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |