cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "M. Schulter" <mschulter AT value DOT net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C |
Date: | 22 Oct 1997 19:04:55 GMT |
Organization: | Value Net Internetwork Services Inc. |
Lines: | 15 |
Message-ID: | <62lion$1md$1@vnetnews.value.net> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971019172327 DOT 27221W-100000 AT is> <62iu98$rfh$2 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | value.net |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
M. Schulter <mschulter AT value DOT net> wrote: : There are a few differences between DJGPP and some other "Gintel" : environments (i.e. GAS + Intel i386). For example, a Linux "hello.s" seems : to use '.global main' instead of 'global _main', and there may be a : different convention in terms of restoring %ecx. That should, of course, be '.global _main' for DJGPP, with the proper period before '.global'. Better late than never with such a basic correction. Margo Schulter mschulter AT value DOT net
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |