cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 22 Feb 1998 13:51:31 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | leger_v AT bluewin DOT ch |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: low level interrupt :real or protected mode ? |
In-Reply-To: | <34EEFE41.448B@bluewin.ch> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.980222135110.19567a-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998 leger_v AT bluewin DOT ch wrote: > I'd like to catch a low-level hardware interrupt. But I don't know > if I must get the real interrupt vector with > _go32_dpmi_get_real_mode_interrupt_vector > or the protected interrupt vector with > _go32_dpmi_get_protected_mode_interrupt_vector > or the both. It is already explained in the DJGPP FAQ list. Get the file v2/faq210b.zip from the same place you get DJGPP and read section 18.9 there. In general, hardware interrupts are always reflected to protected mode first. So hooking the protected-mode interrupt should be enough. The FAQ has the details.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |