Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/03/23/21:18:31
Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
>
> > > This is needed only, if you don't have a /bin/sh.exe on the
> > > drive, where you build gcc. So created that and you don't need
> > > to modify the Makefile.
> >
> > I did a similar thing, in my system I have sh.exe as a "symlink" of
> > bash.exe in the /bin directory. Isn't pretty but helps a lot.
>
> You do NOT need sh.exe in /bin, you can have it in *any* directory on
> your PATH. Both Make and Bash will find it and invoke it whenever a
> script or a Makefile calls for "/bin/sh".
Hmmm... I'm not so sure, perhaps is my installation, perhaps a mistake, but I
remmeber that I tried to make the link in the bin directory without success.
Greetings, SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
CQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013
- Raw text -