Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/04/05/13:53:06
Michael Mauch wrote :
>
> > On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Michael Mauch wrote:
> >
> > > gcc2.8.0 doesn't define __DJGPP_MINOR_ anymore.
> >
> > How can that be? Does gcc 2.8.0 bypass the %DJDIR%/lib/specs file?
Normally no.
> Yes, `gcc -v´ said "Using built-in specs", although the
> %DJDIR%/lib/specs file exists.
If you haven't modified your djgpp.env file, especially not
removed the LIBRARY_PATH setting in the [gcc] this can't be.
But if you have done so, probably because of the description
from the README.DJGPP which coes with gcc280b.zip then this can
happen because of a bug in that README :-(
I mentioned there, that you can safely remove the path settings
in [gcc] and [cpp] but I forgot that the specs file is needed also
to be find in one of the library paths. So either you move the specs
file to %DJDIR%/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.80 or you define the LIBRARY_PATH
variable in the [gcc] section of DJGPP.ENV to contain at least the
%DJDIR%/lib path.
> I guess this should be mentioned in the readme.djg file that comes with
> gcc280b.zip. At present, the text suggests that the specs file should
> still reside in the lib/ directory ("Here is now a possible line
You are right and I'm sorry for the wrong README. As far as I can see
it,
the gcc 2.8.1 port will fix all of this (I'm not doing this job, but I
know
who) and it will probably come out in the next time.
Robert
--
******************************************************
* email: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net> *
* Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho *
******************************************************
- Raw text -