Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/05/15/12:03:45
From: | "News" <mjohnsen AT vip DOT cybercity DOT dk>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | RSXNTDJ Compiler Error (*.RC)
|
Date: | Fri, 15 May 1998 16:14:07 +0200
|
Organization: | CyberCity Internet
|
Lines: | 8
|
Message-ID: | <6jhil1$ckk$1@news.cybercity.dk>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | msx-04-2-8.1033.cybercity.dk
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
When I try to compile a .rc file with grc, it tries to locate cpp but canīt
find it. Do I need it ? and where can I find it ?
Thanks
Mikkel
gpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk
Destination: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
From: Gruber Gerhard
Group: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 19:02:31 -0400:
>Gerhard Gruber wrote:
>>
>> That's not exactly true. If you use the MFC (recommended by MS) then you get
>> hundreds of codelines calling assert() to ensure that there is no null
>> pointer.
>>
>> I can't believe it! I just wrote a mail that defends MS. Must getting sick or
>> the heat affects my brain. :)
>
>I guess that post must have been tongue-in-cheek. After all, *0 is a
>NULL-pointer dereference and all the asserts in the world won't catch
>it. :-) However, cwsdpmi bombs on it while Windows just keeps on
>truckin'...
In this case it is true.
But I had a problem where I had a NULL pointer for a file and gcc let it run
without complaint wheras MFC crashed on the same code. The only reason I used
MFC was because I hunted another bug and that made me note that bug as well.
--
Bye,
Gerhard
email: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at
g DOT gruber AT sis DOT co DOT at
Spelling corrections are appreciated.
- Raw text -