Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/11/14/17:00:26
Nate Eldredge wrote:
> Be aware that this is not portable. It depends fairly strongly on
> GCC's
> compiling conventions and may fail on other compilers, or even some
> future version of GCC. If it's for something like memory locking that
> isn't portable anyway, though, this probably isn't much of an issue.
I can't imagine why anyone would need to know the size of a function
unless they were already planning on doing something extremely
nonportable.
--
Erik Max Francis / email max AT alcyone DOT com / whois mf303 / icq 16063900
Alcyone Systems / irc maxxon (efnet) / finger max AT sade DOT alcyone DOT com
San Jose, CA / languages En, Eo / web http://www.alcyone.com/max/
USA / icbm 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W / &tSftDotIotE
\
/ The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
/ Oscar Wilde
- Raw text -