cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:28:45 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Arthur <arfa AT clara DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | RE: size of a function in memory |
In-Reply-To: | <199811152033.UAA07028@remus.clara.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.981116102827.7241I-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Arthur wrote: > > > If the system breaks down with a new release of DJGPP, is there a more > > > portable method of doing this? > > > > The only reliable method I know of is to rewrite the handlers in > > assembly. There *you* are the boss, not the compiler. > > Unless you optimise using -O3, so I've heard :-) I meant assembly, not inline assembly. How can -O3 affect pure assemby code?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |