Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/01/04/08:33:24
At 09:37 AM 1/3/99 -0500, you wrote:
>What is MS's exact meaning about that W2K will not support dos?
>
>(a) needn't dos , run dos program as well as win9x .
>(b) can't boot from dos , run dos program well .
>(c) run dos program like in NT console .
>(d) can't use anything about dos .
>
>What can we do to let MS know that it's a wrong way
>if the answer is (d)?
PMFJI, but on this thread, isn't the latest and ONLY DOS
(not counting OpenDOS) the one from IBM? PC DOS 7?
I thought IBM had taken over this distribution.
In other words, what has Micro$oft got to do with it now?
- Raw text -