Message-Id:	<m100rWD-000S2OC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:34:19 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: DJGPP vs Borland C++
In-reply-to:	<369E2BB1.1F30BC5B@pc.jaring.my>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

~anonymous <anonymous AT pc DOT jaring DOT my> an anonymous coward  ;-) wrote:
 
> Which one is more flexible and efficient?

For DOS djgpp is far better.

* Borland doesn't have a DOS IDE anymore. DJGPP have a Borland's style IDE 
(funny no?).
* GCC generates code comparable with Watcom and Watcom generates better code 
than Borland 5.x.

SET

------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013

- Raw text -