Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/01/22/14:40:04
> Just read on comp.lang.c that c9x will be standard soon - probably in
> the next year. So will there be an upgrade to djgpp (or GCC) to
> accomodate the changes? One of them is that
Nothing is "planned" for DJGPP. There are a number of factors, two of
which are:
* DJGPP relies on Cygnus and the FSF to provide many of the GNU tools
included in djgpp. This includes the compiler, where many of the
c9x changes will be.
* Changes in the runtime libraries (djdev) rely on volunteers who take
the time to make the changes. If nobody feels it's important enough
to warrant doing the changes themselves, it probably won't get done.
- Raw text -