cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/06/08/12:06:44

From: "Steve Ball" <steve AT effectivejava DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: how compliant?
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 18:58:13 +1200
Organization: Customer of Telecom Internet Services
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <7jif28$3asjg$1@titan.xtra.co.nz>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990606113300 DOT 16109S-100000 AT is> <375bd1a0 DOT 7891186 AT news> <37602ad0 DOT 6670238 AT news>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203-96-100-124.dialup.xtra.co.nz
X-Trace: titan.xtra.co.nz 928825224 3502704 203.96.100.124 (8 Jun 1999 07:00:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT xtra DOT co DOT nz
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Jun 1999 07:00:24 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>If anyone knows of a list of where GCC is not compliant I would
>appreciate it.

On a previous posting in this thread someone said that GCC supported
namespaces, but my DJGPP says "sorry, not implemented yet". I thought I had
the latest version. Do I?

Neither DJGPP nor RHIDE recognise the export keyword. Also the system header
<limits> is missing so the numeric_limits<> template is unavailable.


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019