Sender:	nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID:	<37642C37.FC1DE8C9@cartsys.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Jun 1999 15:09:59 -0700
From:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i586)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: definatly an error in either the compiler or RHIDE:
References:	<l03130305b385ed37e622@[145.98.116.217]> <l03130302b38743f22755@[145.98.116.41]>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dlanor Blytkerchan wrote:
> 
> >> guess what? It didn't work. (Ofcourse not: I had even declared the class
> >> itself all wrong, more like a struct than a class..). The compiler returned
> >> an error message indicating that the fault was in main() (which is right),
> >> on line number 4 of the file (which is wrong: it is line number four in the
> >> method, but definatly not in the file). RHIDE promptly pointed me to that
> >> line. Either RHIDE is wrong or the compiler is (though it was right that I
> >> was producing errors more than it was, so I stopped programming and started
> >> E-mailing).
> >Do you think RHIDE have acrystal ball? I taked a look to the RHIDE code many
> >times never saw such a device.
> >RHIDE gets the errors from the compiler, no magic, no mistery. If the compiler
> >says line 4 RHIDE will jump to line 4.
> That's what I thought: probably the compiler..

Could you post, or make available somewhere, a complete copy of the
source?  I should like to investigate this; if it is the compiler, it
ought to be fixed for the future.

Btw, your messages would be much easier to read if you'd leave a blank
line between quoted text and your replies.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com

- Raw text -