From:	clee2 AT envirolink DOT org (Chris Lee)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DOS obselete? Programmers isnt needed???
Date:	8 Aug 1999 03:39:15 GMT
Organization:	Your Organization
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<7oiu53$ris$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>
References:	<7ob2ge$i3v$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <37A92688 DOT 620B1D1C AT a DOT crl DOT com> <7obvgc$5sf$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <37AA851E DOT 933E1CB8 AT megsinet DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	MHZzsPRhgY0towjJF2AcrMYxyFWubwum3C9JK/L/o2M=
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rcn DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	8 Aug 1999 03:39:15 GMT
X-No-Archive:	Yes
X-Newsreader:	WinVN 0.99.10 (beta 1) [de] (16bit)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <37AA851E DOT 933E1CB8 AT megsinet DOT net>, davidopp AT megsinet DOT net says...
 can guarantee that the

>
>Either ride the wave of the future or get crushed by it.  Those are the
>choices.   In case you are wondering, Visual Basic and Visual C++ pale by
>comparison to Sanscript and Prograph.  How they can even include "Visual"
>in their names is beyond me.   If the fact that you can see the textual
>code as you are writing it on a screen makes it visual, then let's start
>referring to DJGPP as Visual DJGPP...LOL

Load of bullshit. Can you say Linux/Unix? People like yourself who 
actually think Visual Basic and Visual C++ is something to be desired are 
laughed at by most Linux/Unix programers who for the most part can't stand 
these tools.

- Raw text -