Message-Id:	<3.0.6.16.19990809120808.56079b02@mail.cybercable.fr>
Organization:	Michelle's Internet Service
X-Link:	http://www.michelle-is.com/index.htm
X-Moto:	Micr0$oft = What do you want to crash today?
X-Sender:	starone AT mail DOT cybercable DOT fr
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (16)
Date:	Mon, 09 Aug 1999 12:08:08 +0100
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From:	Michelle Konzack <starone AT cybercable DOT fr>
Subject:	Re: decompilation - of course!
In-Reply-To:	<37ADBF30.5143@surfsouth.com>
References:	<37ac687b DOT 6552762 AT news DOT erie DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hello,

yes, thats right and I have seen it. 
You get the source back but do not ask how

I have decompiled the WINFILE.EXE from WfW 3.11
and I have gotte a c-source file of more then 6 MByte.

Good luck, if you like to change anything there.

I have tried to make a german version (from the new WINFILE.EXE)
I have read the first 500 lines and deleted them.

You must be crazy to use a file like this.

Oh yes, the decompilation takes much time.
On my AMD K5-133 it was around 2 days....

Webmistress Michelle


At 13:32 08.08.1999 -0400, you wrote
--------> This was the original Message:
MK>Radical NetSurfer wrote:
MK>> 
MK>> Its not impossible,
MK>> Its not as difficult as some would have you believe.
MK>
MK>  I beg to differ.  It's extremely easy to disassemble something, but
MK>you can (probably) never produce the original source code.  For one,
MK>you lose all variable names.  Also, most compilers will unroll some of
MK>your loops and add new variables and take some away.  It's not easy
MK>to build structures back once they have been optimized by the compiler.
MK>
MK>  Chris
MK>
--------> The Reply begins here:

- Raw text -