cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 29 Aug 1999 14:01:43 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Johan Venter <jventer AT writeme DOT com> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Using DJGPP in class |
In-Reply-To: | <4L%w3.5828$ei1.11577@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990829140056.9438Q-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Johan Venter wrote: > RHIDE is pretty easy to use, Emacs is not (it requires a bit of a > learning curve). What learning curve? The basic cursor motion and editing is the same in both editors. Only the sophisticated stuff differs. Personally, I think that RHIDE is only easier for those who are used to Borland's IDE. If you think otherwise, please tell the details (what exactly do you need the ``learning curve'' for); perhaps there's something that should be done to make Emacs easier.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |