cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Andrew Hurrell" <andrew AT amh-consulting DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: complex numbers |
Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 1999 22:09:37 +0100 |
Organization: | Customer of Planet Online |
Lines: | 22 |
Message-ID: | <7stv6d$n22$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk> |
References: | <6130331027091999/A01665/GMS01V/11D9DAA11E00*@MHS> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | modem-89.astro.dialup.pol.co.uk |
X-Trace: | news7.svr.pol.co.uk 938639373 23618 62.136.96.217 (29 Sep 1999 21:09:33 GMT) |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 29 Sep 1999 21:09:33 GMT |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT theplanet DOT net |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
paul DOT r DOT johnson AT gecm DOT com wrote in message >I am new to programming and have been following the group with >interest, reference Hans-Bernard Broeker's information about complex >numbers could someone expand on the use of _complex_double types, My particular interest is in debugging code with _complex_ nos. In the reference that Hans-Bernard pointed us to it states that future versions of gdb will be able to debug src that uses _complex_ using the notation foo$real and foo$imag (or something similar) However I've tried this with gdb 4.18 (and the 4.16 that ships with rhide 1.4.7) and only gotten the message "foo$real:not available". Any one got any ideas on debugging these complex number routines short of a bunch of printf's TIA Andrew
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |