cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:28:22 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: xmalloc and xfree |
In-Reply-To: | <wkbta7v2tg.fsf@mail.ndh.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.991011122801.28307H-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 10 Oct 1999, Felix Natter wrote: > test2.cpp: In function `int main()': > test2.cpp:4: implicit declaration of function `int xmalloc(...)' > test2.cpp:5: implicit declaration of function `int xfree(...)' This is a C++ program. AFAIK, C++ doesn't permit functions without prototypes. Does this problem happen in a C program?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |