cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | libg++ vs. libstdc++ |
Date: | 25 Nov 1999 21:11:29 +0100 |
Organization: | Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH |
Lines: | 23 |
Message-ID: | <m34seal4b2.fsf@mybaby.home.felix> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | port151.bonn.ndh.net |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | passat.ndh.net 943560690 26971 195.94.93.151 (25 Nov 1999 20:11:30 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT ndh DOT net |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 25 Nov 1999 20:11:30 GMT |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.4 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
hi, could someone please explain the relation between gcc's g++-library and the evolving libstdc++ ? Is libg++ 2.7.x considered a release-version ? (as opposed to libstdc++) then, this is from the libg++ 2.7.2 'news'-file: * libg++ no longer builds as a standalone package; it has to be embedded into the libstdc++-2.8.1.1 or egcs-1.x packages. which leads me to believe that libg++ is only the general toolkit part of libstdc++ (the classes that aren't part of the ISO standard). is that true ? Since about when is the standard (ISO 14882) c++-library being developed ? why has libg++ (lgpp*) been called "deprecated" in previous djgpp-releases (there had been a note in the ZIP-picker) ? thanks, -- Felix Natter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |