cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 1 Jan 1998 22:15:16 -0500 (EST) |
Message-Id: | <199801020315.WAA28535@delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.971124133939.23713Z-100000@is> (message from Eli |
Zaretskii on Mon, 24 Nov 1997 13:40:25 +0200 (IST)) | |
Subject: | Re: c1args.c patches |
> ! /* #define ARG_MAX 4096 /* depends on LFN; use sysconf */ Shouldn't ARG_MAX depend on the transfer buffer size? I don't see where LFN comes into play here. Also, gcc -Wall -Werror won't accept nested comments like that. Perhaps you were thinking of NAME_MAX?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |