cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 1998 18:40:57 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
To: | Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net> |
cc: | Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: gcc 2.8.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <199801212339.PAA05804@adit.ap.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.980122184039.1427G-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote: > Maybe they decided their extensions weren't worth maintaining > anymore. (Wow, *removing* features for a change? ;) This could be true, but I find it hard to believe. It might be a good reason for splitting the library into two different packages, with the extensions in the separate one, but not to deprecate libg++. It's weird, what can I say?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |