cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/02/05/18:32:10

Message-ID: <34DA4071.F845EC7B@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 23:42:57 +0100
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Organization: none provided
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com, dj AT delorie DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: iostream concern
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980205115407 DOT 28596G-100000 AT is>

Eli Zaretskii wrote :
> 
> On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Robert Hoehne wrote:
> 
> Let me remind you the Murfy's Law of Software Releases.  One of its

Yes, I know it :-(

> More seriously, I think we need to wait for some time and gather user
> responses before we decide to make g++ supercede DJ's gxx.exe.  For

OK, I will let it gpp.exe.

> > At first only a small change:
> >
> > [gxx]
> > LIBRARY_PATH=%/>;LIBRARY_PATH%
> 
> Why is this needed?  Does g++ barf on backslashes?  If so, it should

Oh please sorry for it. I simply pasted it from the [gcc] part
and had in my mind to include there only the %DJDIR/lib directory
so I removed the rest (for instance the grx lib dir) but now I
see that I made it wrong.

Of course g++ knows about the backslashes and so on. What I only
wanted to say with the above was, that we must tell g++ where to
look for crt0.o and nothing else, since all the other paths are
hardcoded (via $DJDIR) also beside others the $DJDIR/lib, but this
directory is _not_ searched by default for the startfile and the
specs file.

> be changed to support them.  Does it require the variable to end with
> a semi-colon, or be all lower-case?  If so, why?

See above. Please excuse me, I'm very stressed at the moment.

> I think prior practice is also important.  Since names like libstdcxx
> and libgpp were picked up a long time ago, I say let's stick with them.

OK, to remember the history of DJGPP I will leave them as they are.

> The error message is printed by PKUNZIP, right?  InfoZip does the
I don't have pkunzip, I use a unzip from InfoZip which I compiled
sometimes myself (a long time ago).

> right thing (extracts it as g__.exe) and never complains.

No, my unzip simply prints an error does not extract it. But
probably I haven't the latest version.

Robert


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019