cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 1 Mar 1998 20:27:28 -0500 (EST) |
Message-Id: | <199803020127.UAA03773@delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.980301131058.13547F-100000@is> (message from Eli |
Zaretskii on Sun, 1 Mar 1998 13:11:39 +0200 (IST)) | |
Subject: | Re: Suggestion: Portability section for libc docs |
> I think most DOS compilers are so similar in the contents of their C > libraries (they all emulate MSC), that it is usually enough to have > one category. The intent is to tell people what is a de-facto > standard across DOS C compilers. I recall a number of functions that were added "for Borland compatibility" (like _bios_*). Does MS have those also?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |