cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <199809051202.OAA36076@ieva06.lanet.lv> |
From: | "Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 5 Sep 1998 14:06:33 +0300 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: (should be: egcs-1.1a uploaded) |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.A32.3.91.980904164338.55298A-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv> |
Hi! Somehow managed to omit subject field in yesterday's announcement about upload of test version of DJGPP port of egcs-1.1a. Sorry for that problem (see my previous message for details). Some questions we should descuss: - would it be usefull to modify archive gcc-e11b.zip to provide exceptions support for djdev201 (this is not needed for djdev202, and therefore is not included as I compiled it using djdev202) There is no need to modify other archives for that. If Yes than is it usefull to release it to general users of DJGPP. Unless I introduced some new problem then all that that were fixed for gcc-2.8.1 is in (and also some others). Of course some preliminary testing is needed before deciding. I included in announcement a bash script that does necessary things to have working exceptions with djdev201 (As I said nothing is needed for djdev202) - With the aproach I used there should be no problems to switch to PGCC. When I build egcs-1.1 last time I didn't do ANY changes to sources manually (only through script I included in source archive). I don't think it will be necessary to edit anything manually for PGCC (only one additional patch from egcs to pgcc). Of course no one in forced to use special optimizations for pentium processors. I currently think it is not needed. Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |