cvs.gedasymbols.org/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/1998/11/02/06:40:28

From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <199811021139.MAA03117@mars.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: Out of selectors problem with bash
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 12:39:57 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Ok, now that I've read it, I can put my question:

Would a change so that bash spawned another bash which exited after, say, 
1900 calls to spawnXX, where-upon the first bash spawns yet another bash 
that'll last for another 1900 spawnXXs, etc. work around that problem?

That would give at least 1900*1900 spawnXX invokations. 

Or are the selectors lost for the parent as well as for the child when the
child spawns?


Right,

							MartinS

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019