X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=LaMdGCs6ujY2t0eRhMWAU/b9btDBfezhYSp2o6o6f0A=;
	b=tXzSc1I/uEEa96okxQUUU47WL9VUOezoKQPzjbmOD8STAqoZspkrq/gp9gh6lb7eaL
	0Xl+3bQ2YPwUKqAeh+YWsm2YyuTFeSBSxS9c0R/fAYm5vNNldPAbm/PhT4vmAinAmnay
	9xWmfiyKgPu+2lW4OyMwxNNEgU9cl5lOmEF0H2zu083e88BoNmoyYVRUxby5CQS0eu0F
	7FqZVcj99Qxs99I0akXI0Yh/H9cpyLO1U+ETWwV2JIjK69rnZO72D1Z8iJYmHvl5B2sg
	TyYpmVWPDOqka1IerYAFCsyfC6LcoBgwPu64HKbpk7638/C28UWZjuj/sC84W2Yjc5DB
	KiNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=LaMdGCs6ujY2t0eRhMWAU/b9btDBfezhYSp2o6o6f0A=;
	b=cUD/LmUJ+sTIvO+R3P11Ce96Sejc/J9NsHjvnfL+WJYXXFVBrbBhxkgHH8HMwhybz/
	VXvRtoeaMIcWO8J58cjSdtocG3f0846PdCKRfWE+hAsLbWYRhb7X+TAfafodGUO/lBvR
	rTx5QwHWgnb+HCxFS2hsZs55HbiCRkOP5O1coj3sjSlpDNlh9bePxtbzVv18LZCTZJJd
	5e5qPVOXHGUbcEt/5QYgp+QiHejLcj5GhHsy69voM9s4zSYCjdRjjbHJ0bPWorpCO/PD
	7RAYeUkEdBHmjz88L+Esm8FWmqKmXwgDOenH3selvdBl7wcqotzmEzsE2sAOvTqKsYO6
	/98g==
X-Gm-Message-State:	APzg51A13B5xlB3Hg12jVK8i+gbHdLeY5iaKIML3Y4MyVgwpAM+5l6SE
	r4qhTcDm9G/ASEEF78AyolNYbJNiy1rxwEsaaKUFDNG0
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ANB0VdZbU6CrFO9KMTfXoOQqDIVnEtJA179AzsC7s+UrLteRmd7aWlieAmRZ90FSCyKFkHjSBR7ItFk3nRsE5FH+rdo=
X-Received:	by 2002:a24:41e9:: with SMTP id b102-v6mr4029600itd.19.1536956696665;
	Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAA2C=vCs5JmgWZEYuzBY7bdu-WMxURcqR+V-bb-GNcWVE6unmw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAA2C=vBs-=vUkC_4Ek96cnEPPg0=Dy_LMVM3ALOBThpe08CsYA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83a7ojkfum DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCs5JmgWZEYuzBY7bdu-WMxURcqR+V-bb-GNcWVE6unmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2018 23:24:56 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vAcJ4O=LgH169woSzwKxNDGfNE-f4ipqh1j6=QDRyvxgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: stdbool.h
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 9/14/18, Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> On 9/14/18, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via
> djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com] <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]"
>>> <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
>>> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 21:58:26 +0300
>>>
>>> Why do we need to provide a stdbool.h among djgpp includes? Gcc >= 3.0
>>> already provides it, and looking at deleted/v2gnu/ our own gcc302b.zip
>>> and gcc31b.zip do have it.
>>
>> I may be misremembering or mixing things up (it's been a while), but
>> could it have something to do with the "freestanding" support?
>>
>
> That may be, yes.  In that case, it is still broken for gcc < 3.0

I just tested building a test case like
#include <stdbool.h>
bool _foo = true;

.. with
  gcc -ffreestanding -Wall -W -c 0.c

.. and it does not fail, i.e. gcc-provided stdbool.h is still available
in -ffreestanding mode.

- Raw text -