Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/04/18/13:47:20
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:18:07AM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:11:21PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > ---
> > src/hid/gerber/gerber.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/hid/gerber/gerber.c b/src/hid/gerber/gerber.c
> > index d274afe..cab948b 100644
> > --- a/src/hid/gerber/gerber.c
> > +++ b/src/hid/gerber/gerber.c
> > @@ -697,11 +697,12 @@ gerber_set_layer (const char *name, int group, int empty)
> > Aperture *ap = findAperture (curr_aptr_list, pending_drills[i].diam, ROUND);
> > fprintf (f, "T%02d\r\n", ap->dCode);
> > }
> > - /* Notice the last zeroes are literal zeroes here, a x10 scale factor. *
> > - * v v */
> > - pcb_fprintf (f, metric ? "X%06.0muY%06.0mu\r\n" : "X%06.0ml0Y%06.0ml0\r\n",
>
>
> I'll be sad to see this comment go ;)
>
> > + pcb_fprintf (f, metric ? "X%06.0muY%06.0mu\r\n" : "X%06.0mtY%06.0mt\r\n",
> > gerberDrX (PCB, pending_drills[i].x),
> > gerberDrY (PCB, pending_drills[i].y));
> > + printf("Gerber drill X and Y: %ld %ld\n",
> > + gerberDrX (PCB, pending_drills[i].x),
> > + gerberDrY (PCB, pending_drills[i].y));
>
> Is this just trace code you forgot to remove? Or should it be
> user visible?
My bad, it's trace code. Feel free to remove it or I'll send another patch set. Actually
it's a residue of a first version in which I had forgotten to add ALLOW_DMIL in ALLOW_IMPERIAL
and all drills appeared at (0,0).
Regards,
Gabriel
- Raw text -