X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=DKcNElxb c=1 sm=0 a=PO4O3DH66rOdmSyiQSt8qQ==:17 a=EgL8nvhJGFwA:10 a=jeJY-ZdqjKYA:10 a=rRR8cSWnRIEA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=5S7zg1XOFc8A:10 a=TdaGJWxHLuZKoJYwHwsA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=PO4O3DH66rOdmSyiQSt8qQ==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Authenticated-User:
X-Originating-IP:	24.58.36.244
Message-ID:	<517871CB.6090405@twcny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:59:07 -0400
From:	"Tom, KC2ZAT" <kc2zat AT twcny DOT rr DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Questions before I start building a new home for
	gaf
References:	<516CC2F4 DOT 8020401 AT twcny DOT rr DOT com> <201304160338 DOT r3G3cEk0025829 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <51758F86 DOT 4080804 AT ecosensory DOT com> <201304221934 DOT r3MJYFqw012550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201304221934.r3MJYFqw012550@envy.delorie.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.4.6
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

DJ,
This Email fork has me confused.  I think.  I had no plans to use one of
the AMD APUs.

I understood your reply "ATI Radeon HD 6870" as an indication that you
found this card to work with multiple heads (monitors).  I also
interpreted your response as an indication that your 4 monitors are
driven by 2 cards plugged into the motherboard.  Each card driving 2
monitors.  Please correct me if my understanding is faulty.

Searching with your input in mind, I finally narrowed the field to two
cards.  The Sapphire HD 4870 1G GDD QP and the Sapphire HD 4870 1G GDDR5
PCI-E.

Based on the specs I have at this time, they both appear to be dual head
(dual DVI-D sockets), single GPU, 1 Gb memory, one is PCI-E and I'm not
sure what the other one is.  I'm still working on identifying the other
differences.

I really feel like I'm having a stupid attack with your statement:
> The problems I had were with two identical nVidia cards.  One driver
> binary loaded, but it showed X two driver instances.
I'm reading this as you expected the driver to load once and be "shared"
by all of the monitors/graphics card instances.  That seems like a
reasonable assumption but I'm not understanding how that caused the X issue.

Sorry if I seem really picky on the details.  Before I drop this much of
my hard earned $$$, I want to make sure this is going to work.
Thanks...


Tom, KC2ZAT
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -- Albert Einstein

On 04/22/2013 03:34 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> Is your comment about the card only, or will this "APU" cause trouble?
> 
> Not sure but I would think so.  Each different GPU chip is a different
> X driver, and if you have more than one X driver you need to use
> Xinerama - unless ATI did something sneaky in their X drivers.
> 
> The problems I had were with two identical nVidia cards.  One driver
> binary loaded, but it showed X two driver instances.
> 
> Before the HD, most four-monitor cards were just two separate cards on
> one PCB, so no different than having two cards.  The HD (and the
> matrox cards) have *one* GPU and thus show one driver instance to X.
> 

- Raw text -